The Philosophy of Exhalation

3 days ago By Yogi Anoop

The Philosophy of Exhalation

Is the breath to be pushed out, or to be let go?

This is not merely a difference of words—it is a difference of awareness.

In the practice of pranayama, there is a question that appears very simple, yet that very question determines whether a seeker moves into depth or remains wandering on the surface for an entire lifetime:

Should the breath be expelled, or should it be released?

Most people assume this distinction to be only linguistic. But the science of yoga and pranayama does not operate through language—it operates through experience. And wherever experience is absent, pranayama is reduced to a mere physical exercise. In such a case, the mind does not become refined, consciousness does not stabilize, and ultimately the body too fails to attain lasting health.

When we say “exhale” or “push the breath out,” there is a subtle sense of effort hidden within the word itself. To expel means to apply force—to do something. The very word implies effort.

For example, we say we draw water out of a bucket, or pull water up from a well. In the same way, during pranayama, the practitioner appears to be pushing air out of the lungs. This action involves effort.

In the initial stages of practice, such an approach may have some utility. But it cannot remain valid for an entire lifetime. Within this mode of practice, there is a strong sense of doership—the feeling of “I am doing this,” “I am making an effort.” If such sustained effort continues for years, the lungs gradually seem to lose their innate nature, which is to release, not to forcibly expel.

When a practitioner exhales by force, unknowingly they begin imposing commands upon the lungs. The abdomen is pulled in, the chest is compressed, the muscles become overactive. From the outside, the breathing may look correct, even disciplined—but inside, a struggle is unfolding. And this inner struggle slowly gives rise to mental tension, irritability, and spiritual dissatisfaction.

In contrast, letting the breath go opens an entirely different dimension.

Letting go is like opening a clenched fist.

The natural function of the lungs is to inhale and to release—not to inhale and to forcefully expel.

The lungs may require a slight effort to take the breath in, but what effort is needed to let it go? What struggle is involved? Consider eating food—we make some effort to take it in. But what effort do we apply in releasing stool or urine? The body releases them naturally, on its own. The act of releasing is spontaneous and effortless.

That is why, in releasing, there is no sense of doership at all. In receiving, the sense of doership may arise—but why should there be doership in letting go? In letting go, there is no doer. There is no command. The act happens by itself.

When the practitioner allows the breath to release, they leave the body to its own innate intelligence. The body knows how air must leave. The lungs know how empty they need to become. The respiratory system does not require your cleverness. What it needs is simply the absence of interference.

This is the moment when pranayama becomes sadhana.

From a philosophical perspective, the word “expelling” represents an extension of the ego, whereas “letting go” signifies the dissolution of the ego—an expansion of non-doership. This very state is called health.

A person who is constantly “doing” in life will also keep doing in pranayama. And one who keeps doing even in pranayama can never enter meditation.

The door to meditation opens through letting go—not through forceful inhaling, exhaling, or filling.

From a psychological standpoint, when the breath is released, the brain receives a signal that danger has passed. The nervous system calms down. The speed of thoughts slows. For the first time, the mind experiences safety.

From a spiritual standpoint, in the moment of letting go, the practitioner experiences—perhaps for the first time—that life is happening; I am not making it happen. This experience gradually reveals the reality of Purusha and Prakriti. And this realization itself is what health truly means. The original meaning of the word health is to be established in oneself.

Physical well-being also begins here. Because most illnesses are born out of excessive doing—too much effort, too much force, an obsession with correction. When the breath is released, the body receives rest. And rest is not laziness. Rest is the ground from which health, balance, and vital energy are reborn.

Therefore, in pranayama, the essential question is not how long you retain the breath, nor how many counts you inhale or exhale. The fundamental question is this:

Are you pushing the breath out, or are you letting it go?

If this distinction becomes clear, pranayama naturally transforms into meditation. The mind becomes quiet. Consciousness deepens. And the body begins to heal on its own.

This is the science of the breath’s outward movement in pranayama.

This is its philosophy.

The Philosophy of Exhalation

Is the breath to be pushed out, or to be let go?

This is not merely a difference of words—it is a difference of awareness.

In the practice of pranayama, there is a question that appears very simple, yet that very question determines whether a seeker moves into depth or remains wandering on the surface for an entire lifetime:

Should the breath be expelled, or should it be released?

Most people assume this distinction to be only linguistic. But the science of yoga and pranayama does not operate through language—it operates through experience. And wherever experience is absent, pranayama is reduced to a mere physical exercise. In such a case, the mind does not become refined, consciousness does not stabilize, and ultimately the body too fails to attain lasting health.

When we say “exhale” or “push the breath out,” there is a subtle sense of effort hidden within the word itself. To expel means to apply force—to do something. The very word implies effort.

For example, we say we draw water out of a bucket, or pull water up from a well. In the same way, during pranayama, the practitioner appears to be pushing air out of the lungs. This action involves effort.

In the initial stages of practice, such an approach may have some utility. But it cannot remain valid for an entire lifetime. Within this mode of practice, there is a strong sense of doership—the feeling of “I am doing this,” “I am making an effort.” If such sustained effort continues for years, the lungs gradually seem to lose their innate nature, which is to release, not to forcibly expel.

When a practitioner exhales by force, unknowingly they begin imposing commands upon the lungs. The abdomen is pulled in, the chest is compressed, the muscles become overactive. From the outside, the breathing may look correct, even disciplined—but inside, a struggle is unfolding. And this inner struggle slowly gives rise to mental tension, irritability, and spiritual dissatisfaction.

In contrast, letting the breath go opens an entirely different dimension.

Letting go is like opening a clenched fist.

The natural function of the lungs is to inhale and to release—not to inhale and to forcefully expel.

The lungs may require a slight effort to take the breath in, but what effort is needed to let it go? What struggle is involved? Consider eating food—we make some effort to take it in. But what effort do we apply in releasing stool or urine? The body releases them naturally, on its own. The act of releasing is spontaneous and effortless.

That is why, in releasing, there is no sense of doership at all. In receiving, the sense of doership may arise—but why should there be doership in letting go? In letting go, there is no doer. There is no command. The act happens by itself.

When the practitioner allows the breath to release, they leave the body to its own innate intelligence. The body knows how air must leave. The lungs know how empty they need to become. The respiratory system does not require your cleverness. What it needs is simply the absence of interference.

This is the moment when pranayama becomes sadhana.

From a philosophical perspective, the word “expelling” represents an extension of the ego, whereas “letting go” signifies the dissolution of the ego—an expansion of non-doership. This very state is called health.

A person who is constantly “doing” in life will also keep doing in pranayama. And one who keeps doing even in pranayama can never enter meditation.

The door to meditation opens through letting go—not through forceful inhaling, exhaling, or filling.

From a psychological standpoint, when the breath is released, the brain receives a signal that danger has passed. The nervous system calms down. The speed of thoughts slows. For the first time, the mind experiences safety.

From a spiritual standpoint, in the moment of letting go, the practitioner experiences—perhaps for the first time—that life is happening; I am not making it happen. This experience gradually reveals the reality of Purusha and Prakriti. And this realization itself is what health truly means. The original meaning of the word health is to be established in oneself.

Physical well-being also begins here. Because most illnesses are born out of excessive doing—too much effort, too much force, an obsession with correction. When the breath is released, the body receives rest. And rest is not laziness. Rest is the ground from which health, balance, and vital energy are reborn.

Therefore, in pranayama, the essential question is not how long you retain the breath, nor how many counts you inhale or exhale. The fundamental question is this:

Are you pushing the breath out, or are you letting it go?

If this distinction becomes clear, pranayama naturally transforms into meditation. The mind becomes quiet. Consciousness deepens. And the body begins to heal on its own.

This is the science of the breath’s outward movement in pranayama.

This is its philosophy.

Book An Appointment